Friday, August 14, 2009

Understanding and Preventing Greenwash: A Business Guide

http://www.bsr.org/reports/Understanding_Preventing_Greenwash.pdf

Understanding and
Preventing Greenwash:
A Business Guide
Rina Horiuchi and Ryan Schuchard, BSR
Lucy Shea and Solitaire Townsend, Futerra
July 2009


41 pages
I haven't read it yet, but plan to and write up comments.

Here is an article about the report.

SAN FRANCISCO, August 11 /CSRwire/ - Despite countless indicators that today's "battered consumer" is seeking deep discounts and shopping for necessities only, consumer demand for environmentally friendly products is on the rise, according to National Geographic and Globescan's 2009 Greendex survey of consumers in 17 countries.

At the same time, consumers are becoming more frustrated with the green messages that frequently accompany these products-many of which are perceived as misguided, unsubstantiated, or, worst of all, just "noise." In other words, the messages are construed as "greenwash."

BSR's new report, "Understanding and Preventing Greenwash: A Business Guide," cowritten with Futerra Sustainability Communications, helps companies understand where they fall in this "greenwash matrix," and how they can move toward effective communications that align with the true impacts of their environmental initiatives.

"Today's savvy consumers are not just spending their dollars more wisely to save money," said Diane Osgood, BSR's Vice President, CSR Strategy. "They want to trust the company from which they are buying goods and services, and honest communications are key. The recent Edelman Trust barometer survey shows that the quality and transparency of information going to the consumer is as important as the quality of the good or service for building customer trust. Our guide helps companies curtail greenwash and build the trust of consumers."

According to the report, a framework that incorporates impact, alignment, and communication can help companies stop greenwash and begin using effective environmental communications.

"Greenwash is more than a distraction for the consumer; it threatens the entire market for green products and services," added Lucy Shea, Chief Executive of Futerra. "Even while consumer trust goes down the drain, with only 10 percent believing green claims, demand for credible, environmentally friendly products and services is rising. Greenwash exacerbates this tension. The danger is that consumers lose all faith in green advertising, in effect dragging demand down."

Impact: Making Sure It's Real

A company's sustainability practices or products must be based on real, significant environmental impact. If the underlying objective behind an environmental initiative is to improve corporate reputation or goodwill and not to address environmental impact, the company is likely to be accused of greenwash. If the company has invested more resources into communicating about the activity rather than investing in the activity itself, it may not have any significant environmental impact that is worth communicating.

Key questions to evaluate impact: 1. Is the issue material to the business? 2. Has the company already achieved the results in its claim?

Alignment: Building Internal and External Support

An initiative with significant impact must be aligned with multiple functions throughout the company-including strategy, procurement, design, government affairs, and marketing. The best way to check the integrity of the initiative is with a credible third party.

Key questions to evaluate alignment: 1. Did the company's initiative include multiple departments within the organization? 2. Are other activities in the company consistent with the message? 3. Did the company engage with stakeholders and incorporate their feedback?

Communication: Making Accurate Claims

Companies should focus on clarity and transparency without using a self-aggrandizing tone. Even if the claim represents the environmental impact accurately, if consumers do not understand the claim, the message is ineffective. Along the same lines, the use of data can help the company measure performance against objectives and set a baseline for future improvement.

Key questions to evaluate communication: 1. Does the company have the data to back up its claim? 2. Is it easy for people to understand the company's claim and its significance? 3. Is the company focusing on one attribute while ignoring knock-on effects of others?

"As the one-year anniversary of the global financial crisis draws near, this is a critical period for redefining the role of business in society," Osgood said. "Trust in corporations has plummeted, and that trust will either be rebuilt or continue its downward trend."

Companies today are eager to demonstrate that they are part of the solution-to global warming, to declining ecosystem function, or to keeping toxic chemicals out of our children's products. But as long as consumers struggle sorting out legitimate environmental claims from among the misguided and unsubstantiated noise of competing messages, companies risk accusations of greenwash.

Download a copy of this report at www.bsr.org/reports/Understanding_Preventing_Greenwash.pdf. About BSR A leader in corporate responsibility since 1992, BSR works with its global network of more than 250 member companies to develop sustainable business strategies and solutions through consulting, research, and cross-sector collaboration. With six offices in Asia, Europe, and North America, BSR uses its expertise in the environment, human rights, economic development, and governance and accountability to guide global companies toward creating a just and sustainable world. Visit www.bsr.org for more information. About Futerra Futerra is the award winning global communications agency. We have bright ideas, we captivate audiences, build energetic websites one day and grab opinion formers' attention the next. But the real difference is that Futerra has only ever worked on corporate responsibility. From Microsoft to Newscorp, Royal Dutch Shell to Greenpeace, the United Nations to Ben and Jerry's, Futerra has built a unique expertise in corporate responsibility and communicating sustainability.

Source: CSRwire News Feed

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Vet the Verifiers

In my quest to understand greenwashing, I came upon this article. This is talking about how to evaluate if a certification is for real or biassx/compromises/greenwashing.

http://tinyurl.com/r24vgd

Third-Party Rules

If you or your pro customers are confused about the authenticity of independent, third-party green product certification programs, you're not alone. There are more of them popping up all the time, begging you and others to cite or list them as legitimate standards for what's green. Short of opening an accredited testing lab of your own to verify their results, consider the following tactics to vet their validity:

  • Ask building science and environmental building groups or trained individuals for their opinions of the verifier/certification program.
  • Similarly, ask building product suppliers, especially those not certified by the program you're investigating, for their opinions on and experiences with the program.
  • Research editorial articles and other resources about the program.
  • See if the program is cited in green building certification programs, such as LEED or the NGBS, among other local and regional standards.
  • Find out how the organization generates revenue; be suspicious of those requiring on-going licensing fees to carry their certification label, which may cause a conflict of interest or compromise their objectivity.
  • Look for independent accreditation of the organization's testing facility, capacity, and processes, such as the ISO-65 standard and groups such as Accreditation Services International.

–Rich Binsacca

Sunday, August 9, 2009

Green premium or no green premium

After all the talks and reading I've been doing, I've realized there is a contradiction going on in the clean/green world. Corporations definitely are not going to pay any green premium to "green" their operations. I heard Ann Feldhusen from HP talk about converting a site in San Diego to solar and the criteria to sell to upper mgmt was showing no green premium.

Yet I keep hearing about how consumers are willing to pay a green premium for food, laundry detergent, etc etc which is supposed to encourage new companies to enter the market. My feel is that it depends on if the premium is a few cents here and there or a significant investment.

I know I am one consumer who has very little tolerance for green premiums. In my ongoing home remodel, I looked closely at solar and decided that although it was the green thing to do, the costs were still too high. A payback after 20 years for what is basically a small expenditure and to plunk down a lot of cash - No way. My gas and electric is only $100/month. My personal feeling is that I need a 3 year payback - it's just a gut feel - for any change I'm going to make.

Is it only people with very large bills that are getting into solar? Have they really conserved the energy they can before doing the math and seeing if it's worth it? I guess so. I hope so.

In the remodel we had to decide on flooring. The old floor was Douglas Fir covered in ancient vinyl tile was some kind of tar paper underneath and there were areas that needed wood to be filled in. The other option was to rip out the floor entirely and replace it. I quickly determined that FSC certified wood was not going to work - couldn't find it in Doug Fir - other woods would be very expensive - over $1K green premium. Instead, we had to use lots of horrible chemicals and get the vinyl hand scraped. Saved at least $2K and had to cut down minimal amount of trees. But did we harm the environment more with the chemicals? I don't know.

If someone knows how to calculate this, I'd love to hear it. To weigh which was less worse for the environment and price it.

In my reading I see that the idea that there is no green, there just is sustainability is starting to be talked about for some sectors.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Comparison of Wood Certification Systems


http://www.ecotimber.com/pledgeOverview.php

Examples of questionable certification systems include:

SFI (Sustainable Forestry Initiative - Sustainable Flooring)

  • Funded and dominated by the timber industry
  • Weak environmental protections
  • Allows conversion of natural forests (including old-growth) into tree farms
  • No credible Chain of Custody to keep out illegal wood

CSA (Canadian Standards Association)

  • Allows large-scale clearing of old-growth
  • Fails to protect First Nations

PEFC - Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certification

  • Weak environmental standards
  • No credible Chain of Custody
  • Mutually recognizes virtually all forest certification systems, including SFI and CSA
  • PEFC wood could come from almost any source

ISO (International Standards Organization)

  • Standards address manufacturing practices, not forest management

IBAMA

  • Program of the Brazilian government
  • Low environmental standards, poorly enforced
  • No Chain of Custody

None of the above forest certification systems enjoy the support of the environmental community. The FSC, on the other hand, is supported by major international conservation groups such as Greenpeace, Sierra Club, World Wildlife Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, Rainforest Action Network, and many others.

www.doteco.info - Identifying Greenwashing

Ever wonder what makes something eco-friendly? So did we.

About .eco

The .eco system will display current, detailed eco-information to anyone with a browser, anytime they need it, anywhere on the planet.

It will do this by collecting information from people when they register .eco domain names for their companies, organisations, products, or even themselves and then displaying that information on a standardised, open platform.

As well, the .eco foundation will send a significant amount of revenue from the sale of every domain to eco-causes around the world.

This could include things like biodiversity, preservation, rehabilitation, poverty alleviation, sustainable consumption and clean energy, as well as support for eco-research and innovators.

Together, the .eco system and foundation make Big Room's .eco much more than a domain.

In fact, domain names are probably the least interesting thing about .eco. They simply provide the building blocks for the .eco system. Domains are ideal for this purpose because they are:

  1. part of the domain name system; the world's largest distributed database,
  2. accessible from any web browser, any time, anywhere,
  3. secure and stable,
  4. already used by millions of organisations, companies and individuals around the world.

Once this system is built, it's going to make it much easier for small and large businesses, organisations and individuals around the world to calculate, share and compare their eco-footprints.

That's why we're excited about .eco, why we've been working on it full time since 2007, and why it's so important the eco-community works together to ensure that this global resource delivers the best outcomes for the planet.

http://doteco.info/news/archive/2009/08/leading-anti-greenwash-voice-joins-big-rooms-dot-eco-bid

News

Leading anti-greenwash voice joins Big Room's Dot Eco bid

0 Comments

Leading anti-greenwash voice joins Big Room's Dot Eco bid

Vancouver, BC, Canada (5 August 2009): TerraChoice, North America’s leading environmental marketing company, and a leading voice against greenwashing, will join the global team supporting Big Room’s application to create a new .eco (Dot Eco) Internet extension.

“Big Room’s Dot Eco is about trust and transparency – two critical components of enabling green markets,” said Scott McDougall, President and CEO of TerraChoice. “Dot Eco will be a useful tool in the fight against greenwash by helping to disclose details about a company’s environmental performance and impact. We’re pleased to lend our support.”

In 2009, TerraChoice Environmental Marketing released its Seven Sins of Greenwashing report on environmental claims in consumer markets, revealing that 98 per cent of products surveyed were found to be greenwashing.

The Big Room Inc. application for the Dot Eco extension has been developed along with an international team of advisors and investors with deep roots in sustainability and business communities.

TerraChoice will join other leading organizations including WWF International, Green Cross International, David Suzuki Foundation, Verité, and ISEAL Alliance on the Dot Eco Stakeholder Council. The Stakeholder Council is a key body guiding Big Room’s global policy development process for how Dot Eco should work.

“We’re excited that Terrachoice has lined up behind our vision for Dot Eco – we both understand that Dot Eco must be credible and trustworthy – part of the solution to greenwashing,” said Anastasia O’Rourke, Big Room co-founder. “Terrachoice’s extensive experience with the EcoLogo environmental certification program, and its ‘Sins of Greenwashing’ series will be invaluable as Big Room continues to build its application for Dot Eco.”

Big Room’s ‘.eco system’ will place key environmental and sustainability information along side the technical information collected and stored when a web address is registered. The .eco system will display current, detailed eco-information to anyone with a browser, anytime they need it, anywhere on the planet.

Big Room will submit its application for Dot Eco when the application round for new gTLDs overseen by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers opens in the first quarter of 2010.

For more information on Big Room’s application for Dot Eco, visit http://doteco.info, or follow us at http://www.twitter.com/doteco.

About Terrachoice Environmental Marketing

As a global environmental marketing firm, TerraChoice Environmental Marketing helps grow the world’s most sustainable companies. TerraChoice’s consulting practice converts knowledge of environmental science, markets, and marketing into winning, client-centered solutions to help sustainability leaders deliver results.

About Big Room

Big Room Inc. is a Canadian company based in Vancouver, British Columbia with an office in New Haven, Connecticut. It was founded in 2007 with the goal of empowering the global community to make informed environmental and sustainability choices. Big Room’s three co-founders are committed environmentalists with a long history of working with organisations, governments and companies to bring about positive environmental and social change.

TerraChoice media contact

Kate Rusnak (Ottawa)
krusnak@terrachoice.com

(office) +1 613 247 1900 ext. 250

Big Room media contact

Tom Jennings (London)
tom.jennings@edelman.com

(mobile) +44 774 003 8925
(office) +44 203 047 2308